4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Unconventionally prepared TiO2/g-C3N4 photocatalysts for photocatalytic decomposition of nitrous oxide

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 430, 期 -, 页码 335-347

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.06.299

关键词

Graphitic carbon nitride; Titanium dioxide; Pressurized fluids; Photocatalysis; Nitrous oxide

资金

  1. Grant Agency of the Czech Republic [16-10527S]
  2. EU structural funding Operational Programme Research and Development for Innovation project [CZ.1.05/2.1.00/19.0388]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The TiO2/g-C3N4 nanocomposites with the various TiO2/g-C3N4 weight ratios from 1: 1 to 1: 3 were prepared unconventionally by pressurized hot water processing in a flow regime. The parent TiO2 and g-C3N4 was prepared by thermal hydrolysis and thermal annealing, respectively. The nanocomposites as well as parent TiO2 and g-C3N4 were characterized using several complementary characterization methods and investigated in the photocatalytic decomposition of N2O under UVA (lambda = 365 nm) irradiation. All the prepared TiO2/g-C3N4 nanocomposites showed higher photocatalytic activity in comparison with the pure g-C3N4 and chiefly pure TiO2. The photocatalytic activity of TiO2/g-C3N4 nanocomposites was decreasing in the following sequence: TiO2/g-C3N4 (1: 3) > TiO2/g-C3N4 (1: 2) > TiO2/g-C3N4 (1: 1). In comparison with the parent TiO2 or g-C3N4, the TiO2/g-C3N4 nanocomposites' photocatalytic capability was significantly enhanced by coupling TiO2 with g-C3N4. The generation of TiO2/g-C3N4 Z-scheme photocatalyst mainly benefited from the effective separation of photoinduced electron-hole pairs and the extended optical absorption range. The TiO2/g-C3N4 (1: 3) nanocomposite showed the best photocatalytic behavior in a consequence of the optimal weight ratio of TiO2: g-C3N4 and the lowest band gap energy from all nanocomposites. The N2O conversion in its presence was 70.6% after 20 h of UVA irradiation. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据