4.7 Article

Influence of the modulated two-step synthesis of biogenic hydroxyapatite on biomimetic products' surface

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 438, 期 -, 页码 147-157

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.07.144

关键词

Biogenic hydroxyapatite synthesis; Surface characteristics; In vitro assays

资金

  1. Romanian National Authority for Scientific Research and Innovation, CNCS - UEFISCDI [PN-III-P2-2.1-PED-2016-0892]
  2. [PN 16 48-3/2016]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Processing calcium-rich natural resources, such as marble and mussel seashells, into biomimetic products could constitute an environmentally-friendly and economically sustainable alternative given their geographical widespread. Hitherto, their value for biomedicine was demonstrated only for seashells, with the technological exploitation approaches still facing challenges with respect to the identification of generic synthesis parameters capable to allow the reproducible and designed synthesis of calcium phosphate at an industrial-ready level. In this study was targeted the optimization of Rathje synthesis method for the fabrication of biogenic calcium phosphates, by conveniently adjusting the chemical composition of employed reagents. It was shown that post-synthesis heat-treatment of compacted powders is the key step for inducing structural transformations suitable to attain biomimetic products for reconstructive orthopedic applications. The sintered materials have been multi-parametricallyevaluated from morpho-compositional, structural, wettability, mechanical and cytocompatibility points of view and the results have been cross-examined and discussed. Convenient and efficient preparation routes to produce biogenic hydroxyapatite have been identified. The functional performances of the as-prepared biogenic ceramics endorse their use as a solid and inexpensive alternative source material for the fabrication of various bone regenerative products and implant coatings. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据