4.7 Article

Broadband optical properties of graphene and HOPG investigated by spectroscopic Mueller matrix ellipsometry

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 439, 期 -, 页码 1079-1087

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.01.051

关键词

Mueller matrix ellipsometry; Graphene; HOPG; Optical constants; Anisotropy

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51727809, 51525502, 51475191, 51575214, 51775217]
  2. Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China [2016M602288, 2017T100546]
  3. National Science and Technology Major Project of China [2017ZX02101006-004]
  4. National Key Research and Development Plan of China [2017YFF0204705]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Optical properties of mono-graphene fabricated by chemical vapor deposition (CVD) and highly oriented pyrolytic graphite (HOPG) are comparatively studied by Mueller matrix ellipsometry (MME) over an ultra-wide energy range of 0.73-6.42 eV. A multilayer stacking model is constructed to describe the CVD mono-graphene, in which the roughness of the glass substrate and the water adsorption on the graphene are considered. We introduce a uniaxial anisotropic dielectric model to parameterize the optical constants of both the graphene and the HOPG. With the established models, broadband optical constants of the graphene and the HOPG are determined from the Mueller matrix spectra based on a point-by-point method and a non-linear regression method, respectively. Two significant absorption peaks at 4.75 eV and 6.31 eV are observed in the extinction coefficient spectra of the mono-graphene, which can be attributed to the von-Hove singularity (i.e., the pi-to-pi* exciton transition) near the M point and the sigma-to-sigma* exciton transition near the Gamma point of the Brillouin zone, respectively. Comparatively, only a major absorption peak at 4.96 eV appears in the ordinary extinction coefficient spectra of the HOPG, which is mainly formed by the pi-to-pi* interband transition. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据