4.7 Article

Hot corrosion behavior of YSZ, Gd2Zr2O7 and YSZ/Gd2Zr2O7 thermal barrier coatings exposed to molten sulfate and vanadate salt

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 438, 期 -, 页码 96-113

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.09.047

关键词

Thermal barrier coatings (TBCs); Hot corrosion; YSZ; Gd2Zr2O7; YSZ/Gd2Zr2O7; Molten salt

资金

  1. Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) [1138049]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Thermal barrier coatings (TBCs) are mostly used in critical components of aircraft gas turbine engines. Hot corrosion is among the main deteriorating factors in TBCs which results from the effect of molten salt on the coating-gas interface. This type of corrosion is observed as a result of contamination accumulated during combustion processes. Fuels used in aviation industry generally contain impurities such as vanadium oxide (V(2)O5) and sodium sulfate (Na2SO4). These impurities damage turbines' inlet at elevated temperatures because of chemical reaction. Yttria stabilized zirconia (YSZ) is a conventional top coating material for TBCs while Gd2Zr2O2 is a new promising top coating material for TBCs. In this study, CoNiCrAlY metallic bond coat was deposited on Inconel 718 nickel based superalloy substrate material with a thickness about 100 pm using cold gas dynamic spray (CGDS) method. Production of TBCs were done with deposition of YSZ, Gd2Zr2O2, YSZ/Gd2Zr2O2 ceramic top coating materials using EB-PVD method, having a total thickness of 300 mu m. Hot corrosion behavior of YSZ, Gd2Zr2O2, YSZ/Gcl(2)Zr(2)O(7) TBC systems were exposed to 45 wt.% Na2SO4 and 55 wt.% V2O5 molten salt mixtures at 1000 degrees C temperature. TBC samples were investigated and compared using scanning electron microscope (SEM), energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) analysis and X-ray diffractometer (XRD). The hot corrosion failure mechanisms of YSZ, Gd2Zr2O2 and YSZ/Gd2Zr2O2 TBCs in the molten salts were evaluated. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据