4.7 Article

One-step pyrolysis route to three dimensional nitrogen-doped porous carbon as anode materials for microbial fuel cells

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 427, 期 -, 页码 10-16

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.08.030

关键词

Microbial fuel cells; Porous carbon; Nitrogen doping; Anode; Biocompatibility

资金

  1. National Natural Science foundation of China [21566025]
  2. Aeronautical Science Foundation of China [2015ZF56017]
  3. Science Fund of Jiangxi Province for Distinguished Young Scholars [20162BCB23044]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province [20152ACB21019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The design and synthesis of low-cost and favourable anode materials is crucial to both power production efficiency and overall performance of microbial fuel cells (MFCs). Herein, we reported the preparation of three dimensional (3D) nitrogen-doped porous carbons (N/PCs) by one-step pyrolysis of solid mixture of sodium citrate and melamine. a variety of techniques, including electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), etc., were applied to characterize the surface physicochemical properties of the products, featuring macroporous structure with rich nitrogen doping on the as-prepared N/PCs. When applied as anode materials of MFC, the N/PCs exhibits a maximum power density of 2777.7 mW m(-2), approximately twice higher than that of the MFCs with the commercial carbon cloth (CC) as anode. The significantly improved performance of the N/PCs was attributed to the unique structure and properties, such as favourable porous structure, good electrical conductivity, and large pore volume (0.7 cm(3) g(-1)) in the present N/PCs. Nitrogen dopant on the surface of porous carbon contributed to an increasing in biocompatibility, resulting in a suitable micro-environment for microbial growth and thus helps to decrease charge transfer resistance at the electrode interface. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据