4.7 Article

Grafting methyl acrylic onto carbon fiber via Diels-Alder reaction for excellent mechanical and tribological properties of phenolic composites

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 433, 期 -, 页码 349-357

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.09.211

关键词

Carbon fibers; Diels-Alder reaction; Methyl acrylic; Oil bath; Mechanical and tribological properties

资金

  1. Innovation Team Assistance Foundation of Shaanxi Province [2013KCT-06]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51672166]
  3. national key research and development program of China [2017YFB0308303]
  4. science and technology project of the Young Star of Shaanxi Province [2014KJXX-68]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Carbon fibers (CFs) were grafted with methyl acrylic via Diels-Alder reaction at the different oil bath temperature effectively creating a carboxyl functionalized surface. The effect of grafting temperature on the surface morphology and functional groups of carbon fibers were investigated by FTIR, Raman spectroscopy, XPS and SEM respectively. The results showed that the optimal grafting temperature was 80 degrees C, and the relative surface coverage by carboxylic acid groups increased from an initial 5.16% up to 19.30% significantly improved the chemical activity without damaging the skin and core region of the carbon fibers. Mechanical property tests indicated that the shear and tensile strength of the sample with the grafting temperature of 80 degrees C (CFRP-3) increased obviously by 90.3% and 78.7%, respectively, compared with the pristine carbon fibers reinforced composite. Further, the sample CFRP-3 exhibited higher and more stable friction coefficient and improved wear resistance, while the wear rate decreased 52.7%, from 10.8 x 10(-6) to 5.1 x 10(-6) mm(3) IN m. The present work shows that grafting methyl acrylic via Diels-Alder reaction could be a highly efficient and facile method to functionalize carbon fibers for advanced composites. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据