4.7 Article

Sulfidation behavior and mechanism of zinc silicate roasted with pyrite

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 435, 期 -, 页码 1011-1019

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.11.202

关键词

Sulfidation roasting; Zinc silicate; Reaction mechanism; Sulfur-inducing; Sulfur-oxygen exchange

资金

  1. Special Program on Environmental Protection for Public Welfare [201509050]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [51474247, 51634010, 51474102]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M612583]
  4. Key research and development project of Hunan Province, China [2015SK2084]
  5. project of Innovation driven Plan in Central South University [2015CX001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sulfidation roasting followed by flotation is widely known as a possible generic technology for enriching valuable metals in low-grade Zn-Pb oxide ores. Zn2SiO4 is the primary Zn phase in willemite. Zn4Si2O7(OH)(2)(H2O), the main Zn phase in hemimorphite, transforms into Zn2SiO4 at temperatures above 600 degrees C. To enrich the Zn in willemite and hemimorphite, the Zn species should first be converted to ZnS. Therefore, a thorough understanding of the sulfidation reaction of Zn2SiO4 during roasting with pyrite is of vital important. In this study, the sulfidation behavior and reaction mechanisms of a Zn2SiO4-pyrite roasting system were determined using HSC 5.0 software, TG-FTIR spectroscopy, XRD, XPS and SEM-EDS. The results indicate that the sulfidation process can be divided into three steps: the decomposition of pyrite and formation of a sulfur-rich environment, the sulfur-induced migration of O2- and transformation of sulfur vapor, and the sulfidation reaction via oxygen-sulfur exchange. During the sulfidation roasting process, pyrite was converted to loose and porous Fe3O4, whereas Zn2SiO4 was transformed into ZnS and SiO2 in situ. These findings provide theoretical support for controlling the sulfidation roasting process of willemite and hemimorphite. (c) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据