4.7 Article

Simulation insight into the cytochrome c adsorption on graphene and graphene oxide surfaces

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 428, 期 -, 页码 825-834

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.09.190

关键词

Protein adsorption; Molecular simulation; Graphene oxide; Cytochrome c; Electron transfer

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21376089, 21776093, 91334202, 21506066]
  2. National Key Basic Research Program of China [2013CB733500]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities SCUT [2015ZP033, 2017ZD069]
  4. Guangdong Natural Science Foundation [2014A030312007, 2014A030310260]
  5. Guangzhou Technology Project [201810025F0525]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Graphene-based materials might serve as an ideal platform for the regulation and promotion of metalloprotein electron transfer (ET); however, the underpinning mechanism at the molecular level has not yet been fully revealed. The orientation of cytochrome c (Cyt c) on surfaces is vital for ET. In this work, the orientation of Cyt con graphene and graphene oxide (GO) surfaces, as well as the dominant driving forces, the conformational change and the ET pathways were investigated by molecular dynamics simulations. The results show that Cyt c is adsorbed onto the GO surface mainly through lysine residues; whereas hydrophobic interaction contributes to the Cyt c adsorption on graphene surface. There is no significant conformational change of Cyt c upon adsorption. The heme plane of Cyt c tends to be horizontally oriented and far away from the graphene surface, which is not conducive to ET. On the GO surface, the heme plane is slightly deviated from the normal direction to the surface and the axial ligand Met80 is much closer to the surface, which facilitates the ET. These findings shed some light on the ET mechanism of Cyt c on graphene-based materials and provide guidance for the development of bionic electronic devices. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据