4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Assessing the electrochemical performance of a supercapacitor electrode made of copper oxide and activated carbon using liquid phase plasma

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 446, 期 -, 页码 243-249

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.01.044

关键词

Supercapacitors; Liquid phase plasma; Copper oxides; Equivalent series resistance; Electrochemical capacitance; Cyclic stability

资金

  1. Technology Innovation Program - Ministry of Trade, industry & Energy (MI, Korea) [10050391]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Successful modification of surface properties of a nanocomposite electrode is prerequisite to enhancing the overall performance of electrochemical supercapacitors. The present study was designed to describe the microstructural and electrochemical characteristics of a new composite electrode assembled by activated carbon (AC) powder (as a host) and copper precursor (as a guest) using liquid phase plasma. The fabrication processes were conducted by changing plasma discharge time from 30 to 90 min in the presence and absence of (thermal) oxidation. We observed that merging plasma and oxidation treatments raised the content of copper oxide nanoparticles precipitated (evenly) on the AC surface, along with oxygen. A mixed valence state of copper oxides (in the forms of Cu degrees, Cu2O, and CuO) was found in different composites with and without oxidation, where CuO and Cuo affected a specific capacitance in positive and negative ways, respectively. This led to the difference of electrochemical stability and resistance among the assembled composites. For instance, the best cycling performance was observed in the plasma-treated composite for 90 min with oxidation, whereas that of 60 min without oxidation recorded the lowest resistance. Therefore, a proper balance between the capacitance and resistance appears to be required for effective fabrication of the supercapacitor electrode, specifically in cases involving copper oxides. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据