4.7 Article

Modification and properties characterization of heterogeneous anion-exchange membranes by electrodeposition of graphene oxide (GO)

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 442, 期 -, 页码 700-710

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.02.166

关键词

Anion exchange membrane; Graphene oxide; Surface modification; Electrodeposition; Antifouling

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFB0600505]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21076214, 51425405]
  3. Science and Technology Open Cooperation Project of Henan Province [172106000076]
  4. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [8132047]
  5. Major Science and Technology Program for Water Pollution Control and Treatment [2014ZX07201-011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The heterogeneous anion exchange membranes (AEMs) were modified by electrodeposition of graphene oxide (GO) under different conditions. The physicochemical properties of GO-modified membranes were characterized systemically to obtain the optimized conditions for the electrodeposition of GO on the surface of AEMs. The results indicated that the contact angle and zeta potential of the modified AEMs decreased when increasing the concentration of GO from 0.05 g/L to 0.1 g/L. The higher concentration of NaCl, as the supporting electrolyte, could hinder the electrodeposition of GO on the AEMs for the competitive migration between the GO and Cl- ions. The increase of current density had a positive effect on properties of GO-modified membranes in the range of 1-5 mA/cm(2). Compared with the pristine AEM, all the GO-modified AEMs exhibited smoother surface, higher hydrophilicity and negative zeta potential. It was also found that the GO modifying layer did not increase electrical resistance and had only a negligible effect on the desalination performance of AEMs. In the fouling experiments with sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate (SDBS) as the model foulant, the GO-modified AEMs exhibited improved fouling resistance to SDBS. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据