4.7 Article

Inorganic material profiling using Ar-n(+) cluster: Can we achieve high quality profiles?

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 444, 期 -, 页码 633-641

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.02.159

关键词

SIMS; Ar clusters; Depth resolution; Mixing

资金

  1. European Union's Horizon research and innovation programme
  2. European Union's Horizon research and innovation programme [688225]
  3. EMPIR
  4. European Metrology Programme for Innovation and Research (EMPIR) Project 3DMetChemIT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Retrieving molecular information by sputtering of organic systems has been concretized in the last years due to the introduction of sputtering by large gas clusters which drastically eliminated the compound degradation during the analysis and has led to strong improvements in depth resolution. Rapidly however, a limitation was observed for heterogeneous systems where inorganic layers or structures needed to be profiled concurrently. As opposed to organic material, erosion of the inorganic layer appears very difficult and prone to many artefacts. To shed some light on these problems we investigated a simple system consisting of aluminum delta layer(s) buried in a silicon matrix in order to define the most favorable beam conditions for practical analysis. We show that counterintuitive to the small energy/atom used and unlike monoatomic ion sputtering, the information depth obtained with large cluster ions is typically very large (similar to 10 nm) and that this can be caused both by a large roughness development at early stages of the sputtering process and by a large mixing zone. As a consequence, a large deformation of the Al intensity profile is observed. Using sample rotation during profiling significantly improves the depth resolution while sample temperature has no significant effect. The determining parameter for high depth resolution still remains the total energy of the cluster instead of the energy per atom in the cluster. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据