4.7 Article

Is Draco II one of the faintest dwarf galaxies? First study from Keck/DEIMOS spectroscopy

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnrasl/slw013

关键词

galaxies: individual: Draco II; galaxies: kinematics and dynamics; Local Group

资金

  1. Strasbourg IDEX (Initiative d'Excellence) grant - University of Strasbourg
  2. CNRS through PICS [PICS06183]
  3. DFG [SFB 881]
  4. W.M. Keck Foundation
  5. National Aeronautics and Space Administration through the Planetary Science Division of the NASA Science Mission Directorate [NNX08AR22G]
  6. National Science Foundation [AST-1238877]
  7. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  8. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1238877] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present the first spectroscopic analysis of the faint and compact stellar system Draco II (Dra II, M-V = -2.9 +/- 0.8, r(h) = 19(-6)(+8) pc), recently discovered in the Panoramic Survey Telescope and Rapid Response System 1 3 pi survey. The observations, conducted with DEIMOS on the Keck II telescope, establish some of its basic characteristics: the velocity data reveal a narrow peak with nine member stars at a systemic heliocentric velocity < vr > = -347.6(-1.8)(+1.7) km s(-1), thereby confirming Dra II is a satellite of the Milky Way; we infer a velocity dispersion with sigma(vr) = 2.9 +/- 2.1 kms(-1) (<8.4 kms(-1) at the 95 per cent confidence level), which implies log(10) (M-1/2) = 5.5(-0.6)(+0.4) and log(10) ((M/L)(1/2)) = 2.7(-0.8)(+0.5), in Solar units; furthermore, very weak calcium triplet lines in the spectra of the high signal-to-noise member stars imply [Fe/H] < -2.1, whilst variations in the line strengths of two stars with similar colours and magnitudes suggest a metallicity spread in Dra II. These new data cannot clearly discriminate whether Draco II is a star cluster or amongst the faintest, most compact, and closest dwarf galaxies. However, the sum of the three - individually inconclusive - pieces of evidence presented here seems to favour the dwarf galaxy interpretation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据