4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Consensus modeling with cost chance constraint under uncertainty opinions

期刊

APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING
卷 67, 期 -, 页码 721-727

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2017.08.049

关键词

Group decision making; Cost consensus; Uncertain chance constraint; Normal distribution; Utility function; Goal programming priority

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71571104, 71171115, 70901043]
  2. Qing Lan Project
  3. Six Talent Peaks Project in Jiangsu Province [2014-JY-014]
  4. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions
  5. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu, China [BK20141481]
  6. fifth issue of the 333 Project research projects [BRA2017456]
  7. Postgraduate Research AMP
  8. Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province [KYCX17_0905]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Goal programming is often applied into uncertain group decision making to achieve the optimal solution. Exiting models focus on either the minimum cost (guaranteeing negotiation budget) or the maximum utility (improving satisfaction level). This paper constructs a stochastic optimization cost consensus group decision making model adopting the minimum budget and the maximum utility as objective function simultaneously to study the negotiation consensus with decision makers' opinions expressed in the forms of multiple uncertain preferences such as utility function and normal distribution. Thus, the proposed model is a generalization of the existing cost consensus model and utility consensus model, respectively. Furthermore in this model, utility priority coefficients cause acceptable budget range and chance constraint shows the probability of reaching consensus. Differing from previous optimization models, the proposed model designs a Monte Carlo simulation combined with Genetic Algorithm to reach an optimal solution, which makes it more applicable to real-world decision making. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据