4.7 Article

MS-SVM: Minimally Spanned Support Vector Machine

期刊

APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING
卷 64, 期 -, 页码 356-365

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2017.12.017

关键词

Support vector machine; Minimum spanning tree; Prim's algorithm; Kernel method

向作者/读者索取更多资源

For a Support Vector Machine (SVM) algorithm, the time required for classifying an unknown data point is proportional to the number of support vectors. For some real time applications, use of SVM could be a problem if the number of support vectors is high. Depending on the complexity of the class structure, sometimes the number of support vectors of a SVM model increases with the number of training data points. Here our objective is to reduce the number of support vectors, yet, maintaining more of less the same level of accuracy as that of a normal SVM that does not use any reduction of support vectors. An SVM finds a separating hyperplane maximizing the margin of separation and hence, the location of the hyperplane is primarily dependent on a set of boundary points. Here, we first identify some boundary points using a minimum spanning tree on the training data to obtain a reduced training set. The SVM algorithm is then applied on the reduced training data to generate the classification model. We call this algorithm, Minimally Spanned Support Vector Machine (MS-SVM). We also assess the performance by relaxing the definition of boundary points. Moreover we extend the algorithm to a feature space using a kernel transformation. In this case, an MST is generated in the feature space using the associated kernel matrix. Our experimental results demonstrate that the proposed algorithm can considerably reduce the number of support vectors without affecting the overall classification accuracy. This is true irrespective of whether the MST is generated in the input space or in the feature space. Thus the MS-SVM algorithm can be used instead of SVM for efficient classification. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据