4.7 Article

Gravitational wave production from the decay of the standard model Higgs field after inflation

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 93, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.93.103521

关键词

-

资金

  1. Research Project of the Spanish MINECO [FPA2013-47986-03-3P]
  2. Centro de Excelencia Severo Ochoa Program [SEV-2012-0249]
  3. FPI-Severo Ochoa Ph.D. Fellowship [SVP-2013-067697]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

During or towards the end of inflation, the Standard Model (SM) Higgs forms a condensate with a large amplitude. Following inflation, the condensate oscillates, decaying nonperturbatively into the rest of the SM species. The resulting out-of-equilibrium dynamics converts a fraction of the energy available into gravitational waves (GWs). We study this process using classical lattice simulations in an expanding box, following the energetically dominant electroweak gauge bosons W-+/- and Z. We characterize the GW spectrum as a function of the running couplings, Higgs initial amplitude, and postinflationary expansion rate. As long as the SM is decoupled from the inflationary sector, the generation of this background is universally expected, independently of the nature of inflation. Our study demonstrates the efficiency of GW emission by gauge fields undergoing parametric resonance. The initial energy of the Higgs condensate represents, however, only a tiny fraction of the inflationary energy. Consequently, the resulting background is highly suppressed, with an amplitude h(2)Omega((o))(GW) less than or similar to 10(-29) today. The amplitude can be boosted to h(2)Omega((o))(GW) less than or similar to 10(-16), if following inflation the universe undergoes a kination-domination stage; however, the background is shifted in this case to high frequencies fp less than or similar to 10(11) Hz. In all cases the signal is out of the range of current or planned GW detectors. This background will therefore remain, most likely, as a curiosity of the SM.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据