4.6 Article

Synthesis, structural characterization, antimicrobial, antioxidant and DNA binding studies of some novel homo-binuclear Schiff base metal (II) complexes

期刊

APPLIED ORGANOMETALLIC CHEMISTRY
卷 32, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/aoc.4404

关键词

antimicrobial activity; antioxidant activity; binuclear complexes; DNA binding; Schiff base

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel bi-nucleating Schiff base ligand, 6,6'-(((1E,1'E)-thiophene-2,5-diylbis (methaneylylidene))bis (azaneylylidene))bis (3,4-dimethylaniline), and five binuclear M (II) complexes were synthesized. The bi-nucleating Schiff base ligand and its metal complexes were characterized using various physicochemical techniques, e.g. elemental analyses, spectroscopic methods, conductivity and magnetic moment measurements. The low molar conductance of the complexes in dimethylsulfoxide shows their non-electrolytic nature. The antibacterial activities were screened against pathogenic bacteria (Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas putida and Bacillus subtilis). The antifungal activity was screened against Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus flavus and Rhizoctonia bataicola. The antimicrobial activity data showed that the metal complexes are more potent than the parent Schiff base ligand against microorganisms. The antioxidant activities of the synthesized compounds were investigated through scavenging activity against 2,2-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl, superoxide anion, hydroxyl and 2,2'-azinobis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) radicals. The complexes have superior radical scavenging activity than the free ligand and the scavenging effects of the Cu (II) complex are stronger than those of the other complexes. DNA binding studies were performed using electronic spectroscopy, fluorometric competition studies and viscosity measurements. The data indicated that there is a marked enhancement in biocidal activity of the ligand under similar experimental conditions because of coordination with metal ions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据