4.7 Article

Intuitionistic fuzzy based DEMATEL method for developing green practices and performances in a green supply chain

期刊

EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS
卷 42, 期 20, 页码 7207-7220

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2015.04.030

关键词

Green supply chain management (GSCM); Green practices; Green performances; DEMATEL; Intuitionistic fuzzy set (IFS)

资金

  1. Forsknings-og Innovationsstyrelsen [4070-00139B]
  2. Major Program of the National Social Science Fund of China [13ZD147]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Environmental topics have gained much consideration in corporate green operations. Globalization, stakeholder pressures, and stricter environmental regulations have made organizations develop environmental practices. Thus, green supply chain management (GSCM) is now a proactive approach for organizations to enhance their environmental performance and achieve competitive advantages. This study pioneers using the decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) method with intuitionistic fuzzy sets to handle the important and causal relationships between GSCM practices and performances. DEMATEL evaluates GSCM practices to find the main practices to improve both environmental and economic performances. This study uses intuitionistic fuzzy set theory to handle the linguistic imprecision and the ambiguity of human being's judgment. A case study from the automotive industry is presented to evaluate the efficiency of the proposed method. The results reveal internal management support, green purchasing and ISO 14001 certification are the most significant GSCM practices. The practical results of this study offer useful insights for managers to become more environmentally responsible, while improving their economic and environmental performance goals. Further, a sensitivity analysis of results, managerial implications, conclusions, limitations and future research opportunities are provided. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据