4.7 Article

Numerical studies on effects of slosh coupling on ship motions and derived slosh loads

期刊

APPLIED OCEAN RESEARCH
卷 76, 期 -, 页码 71-87

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apor.2018.04.009

关键词

Slosh coupled ship motions; Sloshing; Seakeeping; Transient Green's function; CFD

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work presents development of a ship motion algorithm coupled with slosh loads and studies the effect of the coupling on both slosh loads and ship motions for different conditions. A hybrid approach by combining a potential flow based solution scheme for the external fluid flow and a viscous flow solver for the internal sloshing flow is adopted for the computation. The potential flow solution for the ship motion problem is achieved by using boundary element method (BEM) based on transient Green's function technique, while the viscous flow solution for the sloshing problem is achieved using finite volume method (FVM) based on viscous multiphase interface capturing volume of fluid (VoF) technique. Validation of the developed method is made against experiments and numerical computations available in literature. The severity of the coupling effect for various filling conditions is studied, and it is observed that coupling is more severe at low filling conditions resulting in a significant damping of roll RAO near the resonance and a shift in the peak. Damping in the roll response in turn results in a low sloshing loads. For a few filling conditions, however, the coupling effect produces higher roll response leading to higher slosh loads. Consideration of non-linearities in ship motions associated with Froude-Krylov and restoring forces, and the effect of sway-roll coupling in the ship motions on sloshing are studied and found that these aspects of ship motions can have non-negligible influence on the slosh loads. Long duration simulation studies reveal that there can be significant differences in the computed tank wall pressures between the coupled and uncoupled cases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据