4.7 Article

Physical Model of wave-induced seabed response around trenched pipeline in sandy seabed

期刊

APPLIED OCEAN RESEARCH
卷 75, 期 -, 页码 37-52

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apor.2018.02.021

关键词

Wave-seabed-pipeline interactions; Sandy seabed; Backfilled depth; Backfill soil type; Pipeline diameter

资金

  1. national key research and development program of China [2017YFC1404200]
  2. research grants of Jiangsu [BK20150804]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central University, China [2014805114]
  4. marine renewable energy research project of State Oceanic Administration [GHME2015GC01]
  5. Open Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Hydrology-Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering, Hohai University [2016491011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The phenomenon of wave-seabed-pipeline interactions is one of the primary concerns of coastal engineers and researchers, as it could greatly affect the seabed instability and pipeline safety. Numerous researchers have expended great effort in studying wave-seabed-pipeline interactions in the past. However, the majority of them focussed on the wave-induced response around a submarine pipeline, in buried conditions, by numerical models and laboratory experiments. Unlike the previous studies, a series of regular wave experiments and numerical model analyses were conducted to investigate the wave-induced pore pressure in the sandy seabed, around a pipeline with different backfilled depths. The model pipeline with three diameters (D = 6 cm, 8 cm, and 10 cm) is buried in three sizes of sand, d(50) = 0.15 mm, d(50) = 0.3 mm, and d(50) = 0.5 mm, with different backfilled depths. The results show that the pore pressure amplitude in the seabed is a minimum with a backfilled depth D, and a maximum with full backfill or a backfilled depth of zero. The pore-pressure amplitude increases as the backfill sand median diameter increases. The effects of the pipeline diameter on pore-water pressure are also analysed and discussed. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据