4.7 Article

Intestinal bacterial signatures of white feces syndrome in shrimp

期刊

APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 102, 期 8, 页码 3701-3709

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-018-8855-2

关键词

Intestinal microbiota; Shrimp; Pacific white shrimp; White feces syndrome; Diversity

资金

  1. China Agriculture Research System [CARS-48]
  2. Guangzhou Science Technology and Innovation Commission Project [201510010071]
  3. Guangdong Ocean and Fishery Bureau Project [20164200042090023]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Increasing evidence suggests that the intestinal microbiota is closely correlated with the host's health status. Thus, a serious disturbance that disrupts the stability of the intestinal microecosystem could cause host disease. Shrimps are one of the most important products among fishery trading commodities. However, digestive system diseases, such as white feces syndrome (WFS), frequently occur in shrimp culture and have led to enormous economic losses across the world. The WFS occurrences are unclear. Here, we compared intestinal bacterial communities of WFS shrimp and healthy shrimp. Intestinal bacterial communities of WFS shrimp exhibited less diversity but were more heterogeneous than those of healthy shrimp. The intestinal bacterial communities were significantly different between WFS shrimp and healthy shrimp; compared with healthy shrimp, in WFS shrimp, Candidatus Bacilloplasma and Phascolarctobacterium were overrepresented, whereas Paracoccus and Lactococcus were underrepresented. PICRUSt functional predictions indicated that the relative abundances of genes involved in energy metabolism and genetic information processing were significantly greater in WFS shrimp. Collectively, we found that the composition and predicted functions of the intestinal bacterial community were markedly shifted by WFS. Significant increases in Candidatus Bacilloplasma and Phascolarctobacterium and decreases in Paracoccus and Lactococcus may contribute to WFS in shrimp.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据