4.7 Article

Effects of nitrogen and phosphorous stress on the formation of high value LC-PUFAs in Porphyridium cruentum

期刊

APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 102, 期 13, 页码 5763-5773

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-018-8943-3

关键词

Nitrogen or phosphorous stress; Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA); Linoleic acid (LA); Arachidonic acid (ARA); Total fatty acids (TFAs); Porphyridium cruentum

资金

  1. Collaborative Innovation Center of Suzhou Nano Science and Technology
  2. Programme for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study systematically examined the effect of nitrogen and phosphorous stress on the formation of linoleic acid (LA), arachidonic acid (ARA), and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) in Porphyridium cruentum gy-h56. P. cruentum was cultivated in six different media conferring different conditions of nitrogen (N) sufficiency/deprivation and phosphorous (P) sufficiency/limitation/deprivation. Over a 16-day cultivation process, the dry-weight content, proportion of total fatty acids (TFAs), and the concentration in the medium of linoleic acid (LA) were greatly improved by a maximum of 2.5-, 1.6-, and 1.1-fold, respectively, under conditions of N or P deprivation compared with N and P sufficiency. In contrast, levels of EPA or ARA were not enhanced under N or P stress conditions. Additionally, the results showed that N deprivation weakened the impact of P deficiency on the content and proportions of LA and EPA, while P deprivation enhanced the impact of N starvation on the content and proportions of LA and EPA. The conditions of N sufficiency and P deprivation (N+P-) were the optimal conditions for the production of LA, while the optimal conditions for EPA, ARA, and TFAs production were N sufficiency and P limitation (N+P-lim). This study suggests the potential application of combining N removal from saline wastewater with the production of LA, ARA, EPA, and biodiesel.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据