4.7 Article

Light scattering on PHA granules protects bacterial cells against the harmful effects of UV radiation

期刊

APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 102, 期 4, 页码 1923-1931

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-018-8760-8

关键词

Polyhydroxyalkanoates; Cupriavidus necator; UV radiation; Turbidity; Integrating sphere; Nephelometry

资金

  1. project Materials Research Centre at FCH BUT-Sustainability and Development of the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic [LO1211]
  2. Czech Science Foundation (GACR) [GP15-20645S]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Numerous prokaryotes accumulate polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) in the form of intracellular granules. The primary function of PHA is the storage of carbon and energy. Nevertheless, there are numerous reports that the presence of PHA granules in microbial cells enhances their stress resistance and fitness when exposed to various stress factors. In this work, we studied the protective mechanism of PHA granules against UV irradiation employing Cupriavidus necator as a model bacterial strain. The PHA-accumulating wild type strain showed substantially higher UV radiation resistance than the PHA non-accumulating mutant. Furthermore, the differences in UV-Vis radiation interactions with both cell types were studied using various spectroscopic approaches (turbidimetry, absorption spectroscopy, and nephelometry). Our results clearly demonstrate that intracellular PHA granules efficiently scatter UV radiation, which provides a substantial UV-protective effect for bacterial cells and, moreover, decreases the intracellular level of reactive oxygen species in UV-challenged cells. The protective properties of the PHA granules are enhanced by the fact that granules specifically bind to DNA, which in turn provides shield-like protection of DNA as the most UV-sensitive molecule. To conclude, the UV-protective action of PHA granules adds considerable value to their primary storage function, which can be beneficial in numerous environments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据