4.7 Article

Efficient reliability analysis based on adaptive sequential sampling design and cross-validation

期刊

APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING
卷 58, 期 -, 页码 404-420

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2018.02.012

关键词

Structural reliability; Reliability analysis; Cross validation; Surrogate model; Sequential sampling design; Kriging models

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11602054, 51537010, 51405063]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Advanced Design and Manufacturing for Vehicle Body [31415002]
  3. Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China [2015M570675]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [ZYGX2016J110]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Surrogate-models have proven to be an effective strategy for structural systems with expensive-to-evaluate simulations and are very useful for structural reliability analysis. Many kriging model based adaptive sequential sampling methods have been developed recently for efficient reliability analysis. In this paper, a new learning function based on cross-validation is proposed as the guideline to adaptively select new training points at each iteration for reliability analysis. The epistemic uncertainty of the surrogate models and the effects of the aleatory uncertainty of the random variables are considered simultaneously in the proposed new learning function. Three goals can be achieved using the proposed new learning function, i.e., most of the selected new training sample points (1) are selected from the desired regions to improve computational efficiency; (2) reside around the limit-sate functions and in the regions with high reliability sensitivity; and (3) tend to be far away from existing training points in the current design to avoid the clustering problem. The proposed learning function is partly linked to the probability of failure. The proposed method is easy to code and understand as well as implement. Five numerical examples are finally used to validate the accuracy and efficiency as well as applicability of the proposed method. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据