4.7 Article

Hesitant fuzzy QUALIFLEX approach with a signed distance-based comparison method for multiple criteria decision analysis

期刊

EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS
卷 42, 期 2, 页码 873-884

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.08.056

关键词

Hesitant fuzzy information; Multi-criteria decision-making; QUALIFLEX; Outranking method; Decision analysis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61273209]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [CXZZ13_0139]
  3. Scientific Research Foundation of Graduate School of Southeast University [YBJJ1339]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

QUALIFLEX (QUALItative FLEXible multiple criteria method) is a very useful outranking method to deal simultaneously with the cardinal and ordinal information in decision making process. The purpose of this paper is to develop a hesitant fuzzy QUALIFLEX with a signed distance-based comparison method for handling multi-criteria decision-making problems in which both the assessments of alternatives on criteria and the weights of criteria are expressed by hesitant fuzzy elements (HFEs). We propose a novel concept of hesitancy index for the HFE to measure the degree of hesitancy of the decision-maker or the decision organization. By taking their hesitancy indices into account, we present a signed distance-based method to compare the magnitude of HFEs. Using the signed distance-based comparison approach, we define the concordance/discordance index, the weighted concordance/discordance index and the comprehensive concordance/discordance index. By investigating all possible permutations of alternatives with respect to the level of concordance/discordance of the complete preference order, the optimal ranking orders of alternatives can be obtained. An application study of the proposed method on green supplier selection is conducted. The study indicates that the proposed method does not require the complicated computation procedures but still yields a reasonable and credible solution. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据