4.8 Article

Effect of pressure on methane recovery from natural gas hydrates by methane-carbon dioxide replacement

期刊

APPLIED ENERGY
卷 217, 期 -, 页码 527-536

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.02.109

关键词

CH4 hydrate; Replacement; CO2; In-situ Raman

资金

  1. Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China [51736009]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFC0304002, 2017YFC0307306]
  3. National Natural Science Fund [51476174]
  4. International S&T Cooperation Program of China [2015DFA61790]
  5. CAS Science and Technology Apparatus Development Program [YZ201619]
  6. Frontier Sciences Key Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [QYZDJ-SSW-JSC033]
  7. National Natural Science Fund of Guangdong Province, China [2017A030313301]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Methane recovery from natural gas hydrates via CH4-CO2 replacement is promising for its advantage in methane recovery and CO2 capture in the form of CO2 hydrates. However, up to date, it is still unclear what influence the CH4-CO2 replacement rate and CH4 recovery efficiency. In this work, the effects of the pressure on the dynamic of the replacement are systematically investigated by in situ Raman. The results indicate the CH4-CO2 replacement rate and CH4 recovery efficiency are related to the total operating pressure and the CH4 partial pressure in a CH4-CO2 binary system. On the one hand, the CH4-CO2 replacement can only occur under such operating pressures that the CH4 partial pressure is lower than the pure CH4 hydrate formation equilibrium pressure and the CO2 partial pressure is higher than the pure CO2 hydrate formation equilibrium pressure. On the other hand, under a certain pressure, the lower CH4 partial pressure leads to the higher replacement rate. Due to that the condition of temperature and pressure changes continuously in the process of the replacement, the research results are of significance for guiding the successful CH4-CO2 replacement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据