4.8 Article

Using ducted fuel injection to attenuate or prevent soot formation in mixing controlled combustion strategies for engine applications

期刊

APPLIED ENERGY
卷 226, 期 -, 页码 1169-1186

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.05.078

关键词

Soot; Duct; Diesel; Spray; Mixing; Combustion

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Bioenergy Technologies, and Vehicle Technologies Offices
  2. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Workforce Development for Teachers and Scientists under the Science Undergraduate Laboratory Internships Program
  3. U.S. Department of Energy [DE NA-0003525]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ducted fuel injection is a strategy that can be used to enhance the fuel/charge-gas mixing within the combustion chamber of a direct-injection compression-ignition engine. The concept involves injecting the fuel through a small tube within the combustion chamber to make the most fuel-rich regions of the micture in the autoignition zone leaner relative to a conventional free-spray configuration (i.e., a fuel spray that is not surrounded by a duct). This study is a follow-on to initial proof-of-concept experiments that also were conducted in a constant volume combustion vessel. While the initial natural luminosity imaging experiments demonstrated that ducted fuel injection lowers soot incandescence dramatically, this study adds a more quantitative diffuse back-illumination diagnostic to measure soot mass, as well as investigates the effects on performance of varying duct geometry (axial gap, length, diameter, and inlet and outlet shapes), ambient density, and charge-gas dilution level. The result is that ducted fuel injection is further proven to be effective at lowering soot by 35-100% across a wide range of operating conditions and geometries, and guidance is offered on geometric parameters that are most important for improving performance and facilitating packaging for engine applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据