4.7 Article

Going a long way? On your bike! Comparing the distances for which public bicycle sharing system and private bicycles are used

期刊

APPLIED GEOGRAPHY
卷 71, 期 -, 页码 95-105

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2016.04.003

关键词

Bicycle share systems; Urban transport; Propensity score matching; Urban planning; Private bicycle

资金

  1. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) through Andalusian Regional Government under Andalusian ERDF Operational Programme [GGI3001IDIR]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cities are implementing an ever widening range of initiatives to promote bicycle use with the aim of improving the sustainability of urban journeys. One strategy that is achieving the most immediate results in the promotion of bicycle use, along with the construction of bicycle lanes and bicycle parking, is the implementation of Public Bicycle Sharing Systems (PBSS), which coexist with private bicycle use. As both these systems (PBSS and the private bicycles) have their advantages and disadvantages, this paper seeks to compare the distances for which PBSS and private bicycles are habitually used by applying a propensity score matching-based model. Our findings unequivocally demonstrate that the mean journey length made by private bicycle is 700-800 m (0.44-0.5 miles) greater than those made by public bicycle. We find robust empirical evidence that there is a complementarity relationship between the two modes of transport with regard to distance. The conclusions of this study are useful for the PBSS literature in spatial/geographical terms, for the management of PBSS hire charges, and in relation to the system's suitability for different city models. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据