4.8 Review

Water-energy nexus: A review of methods and tools for macro-assessment

期刊

APPLIED ENERGY
卷 210, 期 -, 页码 393-408

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.08.243

关键词

Water-energy nexus; Comprehensive case studies; Methods and tools; Nexus challenge level

资金

  1. Program of International S & T Cooperation of China [2015DFA01000]
  2. Projects of National Natural Science Foundation of China [51679146, 51479120]
  3. Special Research Funds for Public Welfare of the State Ministry of Water Resources [201501015-01]
  4. Special Research Fund of Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute [Y116006, Y116022]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Over the past decade, analyzing issues within the 'water-energy nexus' has become a topic of increasing attention for the scientific and policy communities. Based on an extensive survey of recent scientific literature on the water-energy nexus, 70 studies were identified and 35 were selected as comprehensive case studies for review. The reviewed studies were classified and assessed according to groupings based on both geographic scale and their 'nexus scope'. In addition to providing a depository summary of a wide range of current existing methods and tools for water-energy nexus analysis, the paper discusses these approaches based on their main purposes. From this review, it is clear that the research on water-energy nexus has seen a significant increase in both the number of studies and the capacity of the scientific community to productively assess water and energy inter linkages at a higher resolution. At the same time, this review has also concluded that, while many studies aim to develop new methods and frameworks to comprehensively assess interactions between water, energy and other elements, none can or do provide a singular framework for performing a nexus study. Furthermore, many researches are at the understanding stage with an emphasis on the quantitative analysis of the water-energy nexus. Fewer approaches are designed to support governance and implementation of technical solutions, and this is considered to a priority challenge area for the scientific community if it aims to achieve greater impact on resource policy and management. There is a clear need to improve our ability to classify and compare the capacities, strengths and weaknesses between existing approaches. This would better enable a wider group of stakeholders to utilize existing knowledge to improve their effective management of water and energy resources. It could also help focus the scientific community to more effectively improve upon the existing knowledge base and to increase focus on governing and implementing the nexus.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据