4.8 Article

Optimal operation of an energy management system for a grid-connected smart building considering photovoltaics' uncertainty and stochastic electric vehicles' driving schedule

期刊

APPLIED ENERGY
卷 210, 期 -, 页码 1188-1206

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.07.035

关键词

Energy management system (EMS); Electric vehicle (EV) to grid (V2G) and vehicle to building (V2G); Smart building; Photovoltaic (PV) uncertainty; Demand response (DR); Energy storage system (ESS)

资金

  1. EC under the rE-SIZED [621408]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The evolution of smart grids enables active end-user participation in energy management systems (EMS) through demand response (DR) strategies. The integration of renewable energy sources (RES), electric vehicles (EVs) and energy storage systems (ESS) provides additional energy and storage options to a microgrid. Factors as RES generation, market prices and EVs' driving schedule determine the benefits of microgrid's operation. In this paper, a mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) framework-based model is provided to investigate the cooperative evaluation of an EMS operation in a building considering: (i) bidirectional energy trading capabilities of an EV fleet arriving at an office building under a stochastic EVs' driving schedule, (ii) the impact of PV uncertainty on EMS operation based on real smart-metering data and comparing it with a deterministic PV production approach and, (iii) the effect of setting different prioritization factors in selling energy back to the grid from the resources on total system's cost. Results confirmed the necessity of the stochastic approach as in all considered case-studies was found that the total expected daily cost for the system was much lower compared to their corresponding deterministic cases. For the base case study, detailed results were provided demonstrating the power flow between the microgrid's components and the grid under both a stochastic and a deterministic approach. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据