4.8 Article

Wireless charger deployment for an electric bus network: A multi-objective life cycle optimization

期刊

APPLIED ENERGY
卷 225, 期 -, 页码 1090-1101

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.05.070

关键词

Wireless charging; Life cycle optimization; Life cycle assessment; Electric vehicle; Charger siting; Sustainability

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  2. Argonne National Lab [7F-30052]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Deploying large-scale wireless charging infrastructure at bus stops to charge electric transit buses when loading and unloading passengers requires significant capital investment and brings environmental and energy burdens due to charger production and deployment. Optimal siting of wireless charging bus stops is key to reducing these burdens and enhancing the sustainability performance of a wireless charging bus fleet. This paper presents a novel multi-objective optimization model framework based on life cycle assessment (LCA) for siting wireless chargers in a multi-route electric bus system. Compared to previous studies, this multi-objective optimization framework evaluates not only the minimization of system-level costs, but also newly incorporates the objectives of minimizing life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and energy consumption during the entire lifetime of a wireless charging bus system. The LCA-based optimization framework is more comprehensive than previous studies in that it encompasses not only the burdens associated with wireless charging infrastructure deployment, but also the benefits of electric bus battery downsizing and use-phase vehicle energy consumption reduction due to vehicle lightweighting, which are directly related to charger siting. The impact of charger siting at bus stops with different route utility and bus dwell time on battery life is also considered. To demonstrate the model application, the route information of the University of Michigan bus routes is used as a case study. Results from the baseline scenario show that the optimal siting strategies can help reduce life cycle costs, GHG, and energy by up to 13%, 8%, and 8%, respectively, compared to extreme cases of no charger at any bus stop and chargers at every stop. Further sensitivity analyses indicate that the optimization results are sensitive to the initial battery unit price ($/KWh), charging power rate (kW), charging infrastructure costs, and battery life estimation methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据