4.8 Article Proceedings Paper

Assessment of energy flows and energy efficiencies in integrated catalytic adsorption steam gasification for hydrogen production

期刊

APPLIED ENERGY
卷 225, 期 -, 页码 346-355

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.05.020

关键词

Energy flow; Energy efficiency; Hydrogen; Fluidized bed; Integrated; Steam gasification

资金

  1. Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Malaysia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study addresses the energy flows and energy efficiency of integrated catalytic adsorption biomass steam gasification for hydrogen production in a pilot scale bubbling fluidized bed system utilizing palm kernel shell as feedstock. The integrated catalytic adsorption utilizes catalyst and CO2 adsorbent together in the single fluidized bed gasifier. Various variables such as effect of temperature (600-750 degrees C), steam to biomass ratio (1.5-2.5 w/w), adsorbent to biomass ratio (0.5-1.5 w/w), fluidization velocity (0.15-0.26 m/s) and biomass particle size (0.355-0.500 to 1.0-2.0 mm) are investigated. The results imply that the overall requirement of gasification energy increases with increasing gasification temperature, steam to biomass ratio, fluidization velocity, and decreases with adsorbent to biomass ratio whilst no significant increase is observed by varying the biomass particle size. However, a slight reduction in required energy is observed from 600 degrees C to 675 degrees C which might be due to strong CO2 adsorption, an exothermic reaction, and contributes to the energy requirements of the process. Besides, hydrogen-based energy efficiencies increase with increasing temperature while first increases to a medium value of steam to biomass ratio (2.0), adsorbent to biomass ratio (1.0) and fluidization velocity (0.21 m/s) followed by a slight decrease (or remains unchanged). The integrated catalytic adsorption steam gasification is found to be a high energy consuming process and thus, waste heat integration needs to be implemented for feasible hydrogen production.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据