4.4 Article

The association of trip distance with walking to reach public transit: Data from the California Household Travel Survey

期刊

JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT & HEALTH
卷 3, 期 2, 页码 154-160

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jth.2015.08.007

关键词

Public transit; Physical activity; Built environment; Planning; Transportation

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [NIDDK 5 R01 DK101593-03]
  2. Michael and Susan Dell Center for Healthy Living

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Use of public transit is cited as a way to help individuals incorporate regular physical activity into their day. As a novel research topic, however, there is much we do not know. The aim of this analysis was to identify the correlation between distance to a transit stop and the probability it will be accessed by walking. We also sought to understand if this relation was moderated by trip, personal or household factors. Methods: Data from the 2012 California Household Travel Survey was used for this cross-sectional analysis. 2573 individuals were included, representing 6949 transit trips. Generalized estimating equations modeled the probability of actively accessing public transit as a function of distance from origin to transit stop, and multiple trip, personal and household variables. Analyses were conducted in 2014 and 2015. Results: For each mile increase in distance from the point of origin to the transit stop, the probability of active access decreased by 12%. With other factors held equal, at two miles from a transit stop there is a 50% chance someone will walk to a stop versus non-active means. The distance-walking relation was modified by month the trips were taken. Conclusions: Individuals appear to be willing to walk further to reach transit than existing guidelines indicate. This implies that for any given transit stop, the zone of potential riders who will walk to reach transit is relatively large. Future research should clarify who transit-related walkers are, and why some are more willing to walk longer distances to transit than others. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据