4.7 Article

A regional parameter estimation scheme for a pan-European multi-basin model

期刊

JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY-REGIONAL STUDIES
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 90-111

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrh.2016.04.002

关键词

Regionalization; HYPE; Europe; Multi-basin modeling; Calibration; Catchment classification

资金

  1. EU FP7 project SWITCH-ON [603587]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Study region: Europe. Study focus: A semi-distributed continuous hydrological model, HYPE, was applied to model daily stream flows in more than 35,000 subcatchments across Europe. A stepwise regionalization approach was implemented to estimate different groups of model parameters. HRU based parameters were estimated first for each soil and landuse class, respectively. Lake and reservoir parameters were estimated separately. Catchments were grouped based on similarity of their characteristics and model parameters defined at a catchment scale were then regionalized for each group as functions of the catchment characteristics by simultaneously calibrating the model for a number of catchments to concurrently optimize the overall model performance and the functional relationships between the parameters and the catchment characteristics. Calibration was performed at 115 discharge stations and the approach was validated at 538 independent stations. New hydro logical insights for the region: Parameters could be linked to catchment descriptors with good transferability, with median NSE of 0.54 and 0.53, and median volume error of -1.6% and 1.3% in the calibration and validation stations, respectively. Although regionalizing parameters for different groups of catchments separately yielded a better performance in some groups, the overall gain in performance against regionalization using a single set of regional relationships across the entire domain was marginal. The benefits of separate regionalization were substantial in catchments with considerable proportion of agricultural landuse and higher mean annual temperature. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据