4.8 Article

Conformal coating of ultrathin metal-organic framework on semiconductor electrode for boosted photoelectrochemical water oxidation

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
卷 237, 期 -, 页码 9-17

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.05.059

关键词

Metal-organic framework; MIL-101(Fe); Water oxidation catalyst; core/shell structure; Photoelectrochemical

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21673302, 21720102007]
  2. Pearl River S&T Nova Program of Guangzhou [2014J2200025]
  3. Program of Guangzhou Science and Technology [201504010031]
  4. NSF of Guangdong Province [S2013030013474]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Exploring efficient photocatalysts for water oxidation is highly demanded because of their significant role in artificial photosynthesis. The research of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) based photoelectrochemical (PEC) water splitting is promising but still in its infancy due to the challenge to fabricate high-quality MOFs photo-electrode. Here an Fe2O3/Fe-based MOF core/shell nanorod is prepared for efficient PEC water oxidation via a facile surfactant-assisted solvothermal method. With polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) molecules as intermedia, an ultrathin MOF shell of several nanometers thick can be controllably grown on the surface of Fe2O3 nanorod. Charge dynamical behaviors study by ultrafast transient absorption spectroscopy (TAS) and photoelectrochemical impedance spectroscopy (PEIS), reveal that the ultrathin MOF shell is crucial to promote the charge separation by providing a cascade band level, but also accelerate the hole injection efficiency via exposing more accessible Fe-oxo cluster active sites. Accompanied with good visible-light response, the Ti-doped Fe2O3/NH2-MIL-101(Fe) photoanode delivers a boosted photocurrent density of 2.27 mA cm(-2) at 1.23 V vs. RHE, which is about 2.3 folds of that of pristine Fe2O3. This study provides new insights into the rational design of semi-conductor/MOFs hybrid materials for photo/photoelectrochemical catalysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据