4.8 Article

Hydrothermal evolution of PF-co-doped TiO2 nanoparticles and their antibacterial activity against carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
卷 231, 期 -, 页码 115-122

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.03.012

关键词

TiO2; Nonmetal co-doping; Photocatalysis; Antibacterial activity; EPR

资金

  1. Janos Bolyai Research Scholarship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences
  2. National Research, Development and Innovation Office [OTKA FK 124331]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CP-Kp) is one of the most important opportunistic pathogens strongly associated with nosocomial infections. The capsule of CP-Kp not only contributes to its pathogenic potential but also ensures survival for bacteria in different environments and surfaces. Development of novel reactive nanomaterials can help to inhibit the survival of such microorganism and thereby their spreading in the hospital environment. In this work, the photocatalytic and antibacterial activities of PF-co-doped anatase TiO2 nanoparticles (NPs) were studied in details and related to the evolution of their structure and surface composition upon hydrothermal treatment at 250 degrees C for periods up to 12 h. Structural and morphological evolution were followed by X-ray diffraction, transmission electron microscopy while the surface composition was studied by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Electron paramagnetic resonance measurements were carried out to reveal the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Both OH center dot and O-2 center dot(-) radicals as well as O-1(2) were confirmed and quantitatively compared in different photoirradiated PF-TiO2 NPs dispersions. It was found that hydrothermal treatment increased the photocatalytic and antibacterial activity while PF-co-doping promoted the formation of OH center dot radicals. By the application of PF-co-doping, the elevated level of OH center dot led to rapid inactivation of CP-Kp.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据