4.8 Article

CO2 methanation on Ru/TiO2 catalysts: On the effect of mixing anatase and rutile TiO2 supports

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
卷 220, 期 -, 页码 615-625

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.08.058

关键词

CO2 hydrogenation; RuO2 nanoparticles; Titania; Epitaxy; Sabatier reaction

资金

  1. European doctoral school IDS FunMat
  2. Wallonie-Bruxelles International
  3. Ministere Francais des Affaires etrangeres et europeennes
  4. Ministere de rEnseignement Superieur et de la Recherche

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The high CO2 methanation activity of Ru/TiO2 catalysts prepared by mixing both anatase and rutile TiO2 as a support is described, focusing on mild reaction temperature (50-200 degrees C). The specific catalyst design elucidated the impact of the support mixing. Pre-synthesized, monodispersed 2 nm-RuO2 nanoparticles were used to serve as precursors for active metallic Ru responsible for the CO2 hydrogenation reaction. Pure TiO2 supports with different crystallinity (anatase and rutile) were either prepared in the laboratory or obtained from commercial providers, mixed, and used as supports in different ratios. The mixing was also done at different stages of the catalyst preparation, i.e. before RuO2 deposition, before annealing or after annealing. Our study uncovers that the interaction between the RuO2 nanoparticles and the anatase and rutile TiO2 phase during the annealing step dictates the performance of the Ru/TiO2 methanation catalysts. In particular, when beneficial effects of support mixing are obtained, they can be correlated with RuO2 migration and stabilization over rutile TiO2 through epitaxial lattice matching. Also, support mixing can help prevent the sintering of the support and the trapping of the active phase in the bulk of the sintered support. On thermally stable TiO2 supports, however, it appears clearly that the sole presence of rutile TiO2 support is sufficient to stabilize Ru in its most active form and to prepare a catalyst with high specific activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据