3.8 Article

Discontinuation of simvastatin leads to a rebound phenomenon and results in immediate peri-implant bone loss

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cre2.23

关键词

Bone loss; implant; micro-CT; osteogenesis; rebound phenomenon; simvastatin

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS), JSPS KAKENHI [24592972]
  2. Matsumoto Dental University
  3. Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare of Japan
  4. Translational Research Network Program of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) of Japan
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24592972, 15K11230] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although administration of simvastatin has been reported to promote bone formation, the effect of short-termsimvastatin administration is not well known. Following implant installation, 10-week-old male Wistar rats (n= 24) were divided into two groups randomly. The experimental group received 10 mg/kg of simvastatin daily for seven days. Then simvastatin administration was discontinued, and the animals were observed up to 28 days. Animals in the control group underwent the same procedure but received saline instead of simvastatin. All animals were analyzed by micro-computed tomography. Samples at days 14 and 21 were subjected to histological analyses. After seven days of simvastatin administration, more new bone formation around the implant was observed in the simvastatin group compared with the control group. Seven days after simvastatin discontinuation, however, the amount of peri-implant trabecular bone began to decrease. Results from morphometric analysis also showed a reduction in new bone area after day 7, which was lowest at day 14. These results were confirmed by histological analyses. In contrast, both the peri-implant trabecular bone and new bone area were maintained in the control group. Short-term administration of simvastatin may affect implant stability owing to a rebound phenomenon and an immediate loss of peri-implant bone.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据