4.6 Article

Relating coke formation and characteristics to deactivation of ZSM-5 zeolite in methanol to gasoline conversion

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS A-GENERAL
卷 549, 期 -, 页码 141-151

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2017.09.035

关键词

Catalyst coking; Deactivation; Methanol to gasoline; Percolation theory; ZSM-5 zeolite

资金

  1. Australian Research Council under the ARC [LP100200136]
  2. Chevron Energy Technology Pty Ltd.
  3. ARC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two ZSM-5 catalysts, differing only in their crystal size, viz, nanocrystal at similar to 100 nm and microcrystal at 13 pm, respectively, were synthesised and tested in methanol to gasoline (MTG) conversion, with a focus on the formation and characteristics of coke deposits. Over time periods when methanol conversion decreased to 50%, herein termed as the service lifespan of the catalyst, the nanocrystal catalyst incurred 31.1 wt% coke deposition, while the microcrystal counterpart had 14.1 wt% coke. The nanocrystal catalyst showed a service lifespan almost seven times longer than the microcrystal catalyst. The difference in the catalytic service lifespans was examined in terms of the rate of formation of internal coke and structural properties of external coke, as determined using nitrogen physisorption, TGA and TEM. It was found that the internal coke was quickly formed in the microcrystal catalyst leading to rapid coverage of the active sites and blockage of the pores, resulting in fast deactivation. In contrast, coke formed preferentially on the external surface in the case of the nanocrystal catalyst. This external coke was of porous graphitic structures, and thus was not detrimental to the catalytic performance. The coke fouled nanocrystal catalyst was regenerated and the activity of the regenerated catalyst was evaluated under the same reaction conditions. An increase in catalytic service lifespan compared to the pristine nanocrystal catalyst was observed, due to the effect of decreased Al concentration on the catalytic performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据