4.6 Article

Facile synthesis of tube-shaped Mn-Ni-Ti solid solution and preferable Langmuir-Hinshelwood mechanism for selective catalytic reduction of NOx by NH3

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS A-GENERAL
卷 549, 期 -, 页码 289-301

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2017.10.010

关键词

Mn-Ni-Ti solid solution; Selective catalytic reudction; NOx; Competive adsorption; Langmuir-Hinshelwood mechanism

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21590813]
  2. National Nature Science Foundation of China [21590813, 21507029, 21501138, 21577012]
  3. Nature Science Foundation of Hebei Province [B2016502063]
  4. National Ministry of Science and Technology [2016YFC0204204]
  5. Open Foundation of Key Laboratory of Industrial Ecology and Environmental Engineering [KLIEEE-15-02]
  6. China Ministry of Education
  7. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2016MS109]
  8. Australian Research Council [DP150103026]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a tube-shaped Mn-Ni-Ti solid solution for the selective catalytic reduction of NOx with NH3 (NH3-SCR) through a facile self-templated urea-homogeneous precipitation method, which leads to the fine dispersion of the MnOx and NiOx active species in the TiO2 lattice. The ratio of Mn/Ni/Ti is an important factor to affect the crystallinity of Mn-Ni-Ti solid sulotion, and the catalyst with a Mn/Ni/Ti ratio of 2/3/5 (Mn2-Ni3) exhibits the significant structure distortion. The abundant surface defects induce more generation of Mn4+ species, surface adsorbed oxygen and Lewis acid sites, and acclerate the adsorption and activation of NO molecules. The appropriate Mn/Ni ratio inhibits the competitive adsorption of NH3 with NO, and facilitates the Langmuir-Hinshelwood (L-H) mechanism to form N-2, which acts as a much more rapid pathway in comparison to the parallel one following Eley-Rideal (E-R) mechanism. The readily occurence of L-H mechanism significantly improves the SCR performance of catalyst.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据