4.1 Article

Leadership off the pitch: the role of the manager in semiprofessional football

期刊

EUROPEAN SPORT MANAGEMENT QUARTERLY
卷 16, 期 3, 页码 274-291

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/16184742.2016.1164211

关键词

Management; multi-perspective; performance; sport; stakeholder

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research question: The first-team manager's position in semiprofessional or professional football clubs can be viewed as the defacto leadership role. Although there has been considerable research conducted in relation to leadership on the pitch, in a coaching or in-game context, the football manager's leadership off the pitch remains an underexplored topic. The purpose of this study was, therefore, to explore the manager's off the pitch leadership role, utilising semi-professional football in Ireland as the research setting. Research methods: The participants in this study were four first-team managers, four players, and three board members from semiprofessional football clubs in the League of Ireland. The qualitative method of semi-structured interviews was used in this study to gain a rich, in depth exploratory insight on the manager's role from a variety of perspectives. Results and findings: Six key leadership themes were identified relating to the manager's role with players off the pitch. These were: team vision, setting performance expectations, establishing behavioural expectations, effective communication, individual consideration, and use of archetypes. Leadership themes were also identified in relation to the manager's role with other key stakeholders, including: cooperation with the board, leadership through support staff, and influencing through the media. Implications: Practically, it is anticipated that the findings will encourage managers, football clubs, and national associations to place more emphasis on the leadership skills required by managers away from their on-pitch activities, and address these appropriately through professional development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据