4.3 Article

The volatile metabolome of Klebsiella pneumoniae in human blood

期刊

JOURNAL OF BREATH RESEARCH
卷 10, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1752-7155/10/2/027101

关键词

volatile metabolites; Klebsiella; bacteremia; 2D gas chromatography-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GCxGC-TOFMS)

资金

  1. Burroughs Wellcome Fund
  2. Niels Stensen Fellowship
  3. [1014106]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Klebsiella pneumoniae is an important cause of bloodstream infections in critically-ill patients, with mortality exceeding 50% for infections caused by antibiotic-resistant strains. Despite its importance as a bacteremia-causing agent, there is little known about the metabolism of K. pneumoniae during growth in pure human blood. Here, we comprehensively profile the volatile metabolites produced by K. pneumoniae during growth in human blood to approximately mid-exponential (7 h) and early stationary (12 h) phases using 2D gas chromatography-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GCxGC-TOFMS). We identified 33 volatile molecules that were significantly more abundant in K. pneumoniae cultures relative to sterile blood, of which 22 were detected in cultures only. We identified nine molecules that have not previously been reported as K. pneumoniae-associated headspace volatiles, four of which we believe to be novel bacterial-associated volatiles. We also identified a set of 17 volatile molecules that discriminate between 7 h and 12 h K. pneumoniae cultures, indicating either growth phase or cell density-associated changes in the composition of headspace volatiles. Our analysis of the volatile molecules produced by K. pneumoniae during growth in human blood using GCxGC-TOFMS has doubled the number of volatiles reported for this organism in blood-containing media, and increased the total number of K. pneumoniae-associated volatiles by 20%. The volatile molecules produced by K. pneumoniae in blood may represent novel biomarkers for the diagnosis of bacteremia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据