3.8 Article

Efficacy of Intraperitoneal Administration of PEGylated NELL-1 for Bone Formation

期刊

BIORESEARCH OPEN ACCESS
卷 5, 期 1, 页码 159-170

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/biores.2016.0018

关键词

biodistribution; bone formation; intraperitoneal administration; osteoporosis; PEGylated NELL-1

资金

  1. NIH/NIAMS [R01 AR066782-01, AR068835-01A1, AR061399-01A1]
  2. UCLA CTSI [UL1TR000124]
  3. AAOF OFDFA award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Systemically delivered NEL-like molecule-1 (NELL-1), a potent pro-osteogenic protein, promotes bone formation in healthy and osteoporotic mouse models. PEGylation of NELL-1 (NELL-PEG) increases the half-life of the protein in a mouse model without compromising its osteogenic potential, thereby improving its pharmacokinetics upon systemic delivery. This study consists of a twofold approach: a biodistribution test and an in vivo osteogenic potential test. The biodistribution test compared two commonly used administration methods for drug delivery other than intravenousintraperitoneal (IP) and subcutaneous (SC)to examine NELL-PEG biodistribution in mice. Compared to a single-dose SC injection (1.25mg/kg), a single-dose IP administration yielded a higher protein uptake in the targeted bone sites. When the IP injection dose was doubled to 2.5mg/kg, the protein remained in the femurs, tibias, and vertebrae for up to 72h. Next, based on the results of the biodistribution study, IP administration was selected to further investigate the in vivo osteogenic effects of weekly NELL-PEG injection (q7d). In vivo, the IP administered NELL-PEG group showed significantly greater bone mineral density, bone volume fraction, and trabecular bone formation in the targeted bone sites compared to the phosphate-buffered saline control. In summary, weekly NELL-PEG injection via IP administration successfully enhanced the overall bone quality. These findings demonstrate that systemic delivery of NELL-PEG via IP administration may serve as an effective osteogenic therapy for preventing and treating osteoporosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据