4.7 Article

A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Study To Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Intravenous Iclaprim versus Vancomycin for Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections Suspected or Confirmed To Be Due to Gram-Positive Pathogens (REVIVE-2 Study)

期刊

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.02580-17

关键词

iclaprim; vancomycin; acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections; skin

资金

  1. Motif Biosciences plc.
  2. Basilea Pharmaceutica
  3. Genentech
  4. Medicines Company
  5. Motif Biosciences
  6. Basilea
  7. Achaogen
  8. Abbott Laboratories
  9. Actelion
  10. Astellas
  11. Astra-Zeneca
  12. Bayer
  13. Biomerieux
  14. Cerexa
  15. Cubist
  16. Durata
  17. European Tissue Symposium
  18. MedImmune
  19. Merck
  20. Nabriva
  21. Optimer
  22. Paratek
  23. Pfizer
  24. Qiagen
  25. Roche
  26. Sanofi-Pasteur
  27. Seres
  28. Summit
  29. Synthetic Biologics
  30. Abbott
  31. Alere
  32. Da Volterra
  33. MicroPharm
  34. Morphochem AG
  35. Sharp Dohme Corp.
  36. Cempra Pharmaceuticals
  37. PRA International
  38. Furiex Pharmaceuticals
  39. Inimex Pharmaceuticals
  40. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories
  41. Cubist Pharmaceuticals
  42. GlaxoSmithKline
  43. Trius Therapeutics
  44. ContraFect
  45. Theravance
  46. Astellas Pharma
  47. Innocoll
  48. Janssen-Cilag
  49. Cerexa/Forest Laboratories

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Iclaprim is a novel diaminopyrimidine antibiotic that may be an effective and safe treatment for serious skin infections. The safety and effectiveness of iclaprim were assessed in a global phase 3, double-blind, randomized, active-controlled trial. Six hundred thirteen adults with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) suspected or confirmed to be due to Gram-positive pathogens were randomized to iclaprim (80 mg) or vancomycin (15 mg/kg of body weight), both of which were administered intravenously every 12 h for 5 to 14 days. The primary endpoint was a >= 20% reduction in lesion size compared with that at the baseline at 48 to 72 h after the start of administration of study drug in the intent-to-treat population. Among patients randomized to iclaprim, 78.3% (231 of 295) met this primary endpoint, whereas 76.7% (234 of 305) of those receiving vancomycin met this primary endpoint (difference, 1.58%; 95% confidence interval, -5.10% to 8.26%). This met the prespecified 10% noninferiority margin. Iclaprim was well tolerated, with most adverse events being categorized as mild. In conclusion, iclaprim was noninferior to vancomycin in this phase 3 clinical trial for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections. On the basis of these results, iclaprim may be an efficacious and safe treatment for skin infections suspected or confirmed to be due to Gram-positive pathogens.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据