4.3 Article

Mesenchymal-epithelial Transition and Tumor Vascular Remodeling in Eribulin Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer

期刊

ANTICANCER RESEARCH
卷 38, 期 1, 页码 401-410

出版社

INT INST ANTICANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.12236

关键词

Eribulin mesylate; epithelial-mesenchymal transition; tumor vascular remodeling; locally advanced breast cancer; metastatic breast cancer; E-cadherin

类别

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [25461992, 26461957, 17K10559]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background/Aim: Eribulin mesylate (eribulin) is currently used for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (MBC). It is a cytotoxic agent with unique mechanisms that suppress the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) of cancer cells and promote tumor vascular remodeling. In this study, we investigated the expression of markers for EMT and hypoxia in sets of clinical specimens collected before and after eribulin treatment to verify its unique mechanisms. Patients and Methods: The expression of markers for EMT and cellular hypoxia [E-cadherin, N-cadherin, vimentin, and carbonic anhydrase 9 (CA9)] was examined immunohistochemically in MBC tissues collected from 20 patients before and after chemotherapy with either eribulin (n=10) or paclitaxel (n=10). Results: An increase of E-cadherin and decrease of CA9 expression were observed in MBC tissues from patients with objective clinical responses to eribulin treatment. Patients with E-cadherin-positive conversion and CA9-negative conversion had significantly higher response rates (p=0.004 and p=0.024, respectively) and prolonged time to treatment failure (p=0.018 and p=0.038, respectively) than patients without changes in marker expression. Conclusion: Expression of EMT and hypoxia markers in clinical samples from patients with MBC was suppressed by eribulin treatment. The results provide additional clinical data on improved survival of patients treated with eribulin and the mechanism of response.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据