4.6 Article

An enhanced procedure for managing blood supply chain under disruptions and uncertainties

期刊

ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH
卷 283, 期 1-2, 页码 1413-1462

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10479-018-2873-4

关键词

Blood supply chain; Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process; Grey rational analysis; Disruption risk; Fuzzy-robust programming; P-robustness

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As a service-oriented supply chain, blood supply chain management deals with a human-to-human network involved with a number of direct challenges such as irregularity in both blood supply and demand as well as multiplicity of blood products, their respective lifetimes and perishability. Besides, facing risks originating from natural disasters or man-made incidents such as labor strikes, economic problems, and so on, and from uncertainty embedded in the input data is also a real highlight in designing and managing a blood supply chain network. This paper addresses an enhanced perspective incorporating a two-phase preemptive policy by which the disruption risk is diminished through a hybrid technique using the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and grey rational analysis for determining supplementary blood facilities, to cooperate in production process and decrease interruptions. Furthermore, a p-robust formulation is presented to control the network reliability under disruption scenarios at minimum cost. To protect the network against the uncertainty, a consolidated approach based on a recently developed fuzzy measure is extended. We also examine the validity and practicality of the proposed model and its solution perspective along with the reliability of the network by a real case of Iran. It is worth nothing that the problems in the case of disasters in which the impact of the two risk streams will be felt most keenly, could benefit from the proposed procedure advantages since it develops a proactive and controlling approach which can be extensively applicable in disastrous situation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据