4.6 Article

Interval cross efficiency for fully ranking decision making units using DEA/AHP approach

期刊

ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH
卷 271, 期 2, 页码 297-317

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10479-018-2766-6

关键词

Data envelopment analysis; Analytic hierarchy process; Interval multiplicative preference relation; Consistency

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71501189, 71571192]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province [2017JJ3397]
  3. open project of Mobile Health Ministry of Education-China Mobile Joint Laboratory of Central South University
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Special Foundation [2015T80901]
  5. State Key Program of National Natural Science of China [71631008]
  6. Major Project for National Natural Science Foundation of China [71790615]
  7. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2014M560655]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a popular technique for measuring the relative efficiency of a set of decision making units (DMUs). Fully ranking DMUs is a traditional and important topic in DEA. In various types of ranking methods, cross efficiency method receives much attention from researchers because it evaluates DMUs by using self and peer evaluation. However, cross efficiency score is usual nonuniqueness. This paper combines the DEA and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to fully rank the DMUs that considers all possible cross efficiencies of a DMU with respect to all the other DMUs. We firstly measure the interval cross efficiency of each DMU. Based on the interval cross efficiency, relative efficiency pairwise comparison between each pair of DMUs is used to construct interval multiplicative preference relations (IMPRs). To obtain the consistency ranking order, a method to derive consistent IMPRs is developed. After that, the full ranking order of DMUs from completely consistent IMPRs is derived. It is worth noting that our DEA/AHP approach not only avoids overestimation of DMUs' efficiency by only self-evaluation, but also eliminates the subjectivity of pairwise comparison between DMUs in AHP. Finally, a real example is offered to illustrate the feasibility and practicality of the proposed procedure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据