4.5 Review

Azole antifungals: 35 years of invasive fungal infection management

期刊

EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTI-INFECTIVE THERAPY
卷 13, 期 6, 页码 787-798

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1586/14787210.2015.1032939

关键词

albaconazole; antifungals; azole; isavuconazole; ravuconazole

资金

  1. Pfizer
  2. Merck
  3. Astellas
  4. Viamet
  5. F2G
  6. Tokoyama
  7. Scynexis
  8. Amplyx

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Prior to 1981, treatment options for invasive fungal infections were limited and associated with significant toxicities. The introduction of ketoconazole marked the beginning of an era of dramatic improvements over previous therapies for non-life-threatening mycosis. After nearly a decade of use, ketoconazole was quickly replaced by the triazoles fluconazole and itraconazole due to significant improvements in pharmacokinetic profile, spectrum of activity and safety. The triazoles posaconazole and voriconazole followed, and were better known for their further extended spectrum, specifically against emerging mold infections. With the exception of fluconazole, the triazoles have been plagued with significant inter-and intrapatient pharmacokinetic variability and all possess significant drug interactions. Azoles currently in development appear to combine an in vitro spectrum of activity comparable to voriconazole and posaconazole with more predictable pharmacokinetics and fewer adverse effects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据