4.3 Article

Diversity and symbiotic divergence of endophytic and non-endophytic rhizobia of Medicago sativa

期刊

ANNALS OF MICROBIOLOGY
卷 68, 期 5, 页码 247-260

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1007/s13213-018-1333-3

关键词

Medicago sativa; Rhizobium; Phenotypic diversity; Genetic diversity; Symbiotic divergence

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [31562666]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Knowledge of rhizobium diversity is helping to enable the utilization of rhizobial resources. To analyze the phenotypic and genetic diversity and the symbiotic divergence of rhizobia of Medicago sativa, 30 endophytic and non-endophytic isolates were collected from different parts of five alfalfa varieties in three geographic locations in Gansu, China. Numerical analyses based on 72 phenotypic properties and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) fingerprinting indicated the abundant phenotypic and genetic diversity of the tested strains. According to the phylogenetic analysis of 16S RNA, atpD, glnII, and recA gene sequences, Rhizobium and Ensifer were further classified into four different genotypes: Rhizobium radiobacter, Rhizobium sp., Rhizobium rosettiformans, and Ensifer meliloti. The differences in architecture and functioning of the rhizobial genomes and, to a lesser extent, environment diversification helped explain the diversity of tested strains. The tested strains exhibited similar symbiotic feature when inoculated onto M. sativa cvs. Gannong Nos. 3 and 9 and Qingshui plants for the clustering feature of their parameter values. An obvious symbiotic divergence of rhizobial strains was observed in M. sativa cvs. Longzhong and WL168HQ plants because of the scattered parameter values. Their symbiotic divergence differed according to alfalfa varieties, which indicated that the sensitivity of different alfalfa varieties to rhizobial strains may differ. Most of the tested strains exhibited plant growth-promoting traits including phosphate solubilization and production of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) when colonizing plant tissues and soil.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据