4.7 Article

THE INTRINSIC SHAPE OF SAGITTARIUS A* AT 3.5mm WAVELENGTH

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 824, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/0004-637X/824/1/40

关键词

accretion, accretion disks; galaxies: active; galaxies: individual (Sgr A*); Galaxy: center; techniques: interferometric

资金

  1. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia, Mexico
  2. DGAPA, UNAM
  3. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation [GBMF-3561]
  4. US National Science Foundation [AST-1310896, AST-1211539, AST-1337663]
  5. National Science Foundation
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  7. Division Of Astronomical Sciences [1310896, 1337663] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The radio emission from Sgr A* is thought to be powered by accretion onto a supermassive black hole of similar to 4 x 10(6) M-circle dot at the Galactic Center. At millimeter wavelengths, Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI) observations can directly resolve the bright innermost accretion region of Sgr A*. Motivated by the addition of many sensitive long baselines in the north-south direction, we developed a full VLBI capability at the Large Millimeter Telescope Alfonso Serrano (LMT). We successfully detected Sgr A* at 3.5 mm with an array consisting of six Very Long Baseline Array telescopes and the LMT. We model the source as an elliptical Gaussian brightness distribution and estimate the scattered size and orientation of the source from closure amplitude and self-calibration analysis, obtaining consistent results between methods and epochs. We then use the known scattering kernel to determine the intrinsic two-dimensional source size at 3.5 mm: (147 +/- 7 mu as) x (120 +/- 12 mu as), at position angle 88 degrees +/- 7 degrees east of north. Finally, we detect non-zero closure phases on some baseline triangles, but we show that these are consistent with being introduced by refractive scattering in the interstellar medium and do not require intrinsic source asymmetry to explain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据