4.7 Article

ASTEROSEISMIC SIGNATURES OF EVOLVING INTERNAL STELLAR MAGNETIC FIELDS

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 824, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/0004-637X/824/1/14

关键词

asteroseismology; stars: evolution; stars: interiors; stars: magnetic field; stars: oscillations

资金

  1. NSF [AST-1205732]
  2. Lee DuBridge Fellowship at Caltech
  3. National Science Foundation [NSF PHY11-25915, AST 11-09174]
  4. NASA under TCAN [NNX14AB53G]
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  6. Division Of Astronomical Sciences [1109174] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent asteroseismic analyses indicate the presence of strong (B greater than or similar to 10(5) G) magnetic fields in the cores of many red giant stars. Here, we examine the implications of these results for the evolution of stellar magnetic fields, and we make predictions for future observations. Those stars with suppressed dipole modes indicative of strong core fields should exhibit moderate but detectable quadrupole mode suppression. The long magnetic diffusion times within stellar cores ensure that dynamo-generated fields are confined to mass coordinates within the main- sequence (MS) convective core, and the observed sharp increase in dipole mode suppression rates above 1.5M(circle dot) is likely explained by the larger convective core masses and faster rotation of these more massive stars. In clump stars, core fields of similar to 10(5) G can suppress dipole modes, whose visibility should be equal to or less than the visibility of suppressed modes in ascending red giants. High dipole mode suppression rates in low-mass (M less than or similar to 2 M-circle dot) clump stars would indicate that magnetic fields generated during the MS can withstand subsequent convective phases and survive into the compact remnant phase. Finally, we discuss implications for observed magnetic fields in white dwarfs and neutron stars, as well as the effects of magnetic fields in various types of pulsating stars.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据